What does Sightengine AI detection cover?
Sightengine AI detection is part of a media analysis API built for developers. As described on its website in October 2026, it flags AI-generated images, deepfakes and AI manipulations, and it has separate products for AI video detection, AI voice detection and AI music detection.
Its image detection page says the model works on the pixel content itself, not on metadata or watermarks, and names several popular image generators it was built to recognize. For voice, the site says it detects synthetic speech and voice clones from any generator, purely from the audio.
Beyond AI detection, Sightengine lists a broad moderation and analysis toolkit:
- A separate deepfake detection product focused on face swaps and facial manipulation.
- Image, video and live-stream moderation with many moderation classes, plus text moderation and audio profanity detection.
- Face liveness detection, profile picture validation and age group estimation.
- Duplicate and similar image search, OCR and image quality assessment.
- A REST API it describes as designed by developers for developers, and a drag-and-drop dashboard for people who do not code.
Its use cases include marketplaces and e-commerce, profile moderation, insurance claims, identity checks and misinformation.
When is Sightengine the better choice?
Sightengine is the better choice when detection must run automatically on every upload in your product. Choose Sightengine if:
- You need an AI image detection API. AnyFact has no public API yet.
- You moderate user content and need nudity, violence or other moderation classes alongside AI detection. AnyFact does not moderate content.
- You run onboarding or account recovery and need face liveness checks.
- You moderate live streams.
- You need AI music detection.
- You want to find duplicates or near-duplicates of an image across your platform.
Put simply, if a machine needs the answer, an API-first service like Sightengine is the right category. AnyFact is built for the moment when a person needs the answer and has to stand behind it in front of a colleague or a client.
Where AnyFact differs from Sightengine
AnyFact is designed around one reviewer and one file at a time. The output is meant to be read, shared and defended, not parsed by code.
Provenance before pixels
AnyFact first reads C2PA content credentials and EXIF/XMP metadata. If a file declares that a known AI generator made it, the verdict is probably AI and the reason is quoted. Only then does an open-source classifier score the image. Our content credentials checker shows exactly what a file declares about itself.
An explanation you can hand to someone else
Instead of a score, AnyFact gives probably human, uncertain or probably AI. The AI image detector also lists visible anomalies, such as hands, lettering, shadows, reflections and textures, so a reviewer can check them with their own eyes. Every result comes with a PDF report.
Formats beyond media
AnyFact also checks text, PDF, DOCX and PPTX documents, code (beta, the least reliable of the seven) and whole websites. An insurance handler can check the claim photos, the voice message and the supporting PDF in one account. The limits are stated plainly: photos up to 20 MB, videos up to 200 MB and 3 minutes, voice files up to 25 MB and 5 minutes.
Voice with a scam check
The voice detector scores each segment with an open-source anti-spoofing model, transcribes the speech with Whisper and checks the transcript for urgency, secrecy, money requests and changed bank details.
When does a Sightengine alternative make sense?
A Sightengine alternative makes sense when the person checking the file also has to explain the decision. In those jobs, a written verdict, a list of signals and a report often matter more than speed or volume.
Claims handlers
A suspicious damage photo usually arrives with an invoice and sometimes a voice message. Checking all three in one place, with a PDF report for the claim file, fits the way handlers work. Our page on insurance claims describes the routine in more detail.
Journalists and fact-checkers
A verification desk has to say why it doubts an image, not just that a model scored it highly. Listed anomalies and provenance findings are easier to cite and to check again later.
Small teams without developers
If nobody on your team writes code, an API is of little use, however good it is. Sightengine’s dashboard is one answer; a web app built around explained verdicts, such as AnyFact, is another.
When to stay with Sightengine
If you process user uploads by the thousand, need moderation categories or want results inside your own product, an API-first service remains the right tool, and AnyFact is not built for that today.
Sightengine vs AnyFact: side by side
The table sets out features from Sightengine’s website in October 2026 against AnyFact’s product in the same month. It makes no claim about accuracy.
| Criterion | Sightengine | AnyFact |
|---|---|---|
| AI images | Yes, from pixel content | Yes, provenance first, then classifier and visible anomalies |
| Deepfakes and face swaps | Yes, separate product | Yes, face-swap check inside the video detector |
| AI video | Yes | Yes, one frame per second, timeline |
| AI voice | Yes | Yes, with transcript scam-pattern check |
| AI music | Yes | No |
| AI text, documents, code, websites | Not stated | Yes (code in beta) |
| Content moderation | Yes, images, video, live streams, text, audio | No |
| Face liveness | Yes | No |
| Provenance (C2PA, metadata) | Not used for AI image detection, per its page | Yes, checked first |
| Result format | API response; dashboard for manual checks | 3-level verdict, explanation, PDF report |
| API | Yes, REST | Not yet |
| Main audience | Developers, enterprises, trust and safety teams | People reviewing individual files |
Cells marked “Not stated” cover features we did not find on Sightengine’s website in October 2026. That does not prove they are absent, so ask Sightengine if one of them is essential to you.
AI Photo Detector · Free plan
Check an image: content credentials and metadata first, then a classifier and a list of visible anomalies.
Pixel analysis or provenance: which tells you more about an image?
Each answers a different question, and the strongest checks use both. Provenance tells you what a file says about its own origin. Pixel analysis tells you what the image itself looks like, whatever the file says.
- Provenance is clear when it is present: if C2PA content credentials name an AI generator, you have a stated origin, not a statistical guess.
- Provenance is often missing: screenshots, re-uploads and many social platforms strip metadata, so its absence proves nothing.
- Pixel analysis works on any image, including stripped copies, which is why Sightengine’s approach does not depend on metadata.
- Pixel analysis is probabilistic: compression, cropping, filters and heavy editing make every classifier less certain.
AnyFact uses both in order: provenance first, because a declared origin is the clearest evidence, then the classifier when the file says nothing. To learn what content credentials contain and why they disappear, read our guide on what C2PA content credentials are. Google’s invisible watermark is covered in our guide on what SynthID is.
In practice, start with the cheapest check. Look at the file’s credentials and metadata, then run a classifier, then look at the image yourself for the usual anomalies. If the three disagree, treat the image as unresolved and look for the original source before you decide anything.
What should you look for in an AI image detection API?
Look for an API that returns more than a single number, documents its limits and fits your volume and data rules. AnyFact does not offer an API yet, so this checklist is for comparing API-first providers such as Sightengine, Hive, Copyleaks, TruthScan, Reality Defender and Resemble AI.
- 01Coverage: images only, or also video, audio and face swaps through the same integration?
- 02Granularity: does the response point to regions, frames or segments, or give one score per file?
- 03Generator hints: does it suggest which tool likely produced the content?
- 04Edited content: what does the vendor say about partly edited or inpainted images?
- 05Hard inputs: how does it treat screenshots, heavy compression and small images?
- 06Data handling: retention, training use, hosting region and on-premise options.
- 07Human review: is there a dashboard so your moderators can look at borderline cases?
Whatever you choose, route borderline results to a person. Our page on trust and safety moderation covers how to combine automatic screening with human review, and our page for marketplaces and e-commerce covers fake product photos and listings.
Run a short pilot before signing anything. Send a week of real traffic, or a representative sample of it, through each candidate API, then have a person review every borderline case. The pilot tells you how often the tool hesitates on your content, which matters as much as how often it is right.
How do you compare Sightengine and AnyFact on your own files?
Use the same set of images on both, including the messy files you really receive. Clean test images flatter every detector.
If your workflow involves people’s faces, such as profile photos or identity selfies, add a few of those too, with consent. Face images raise different problems from landscapes or product shots, and some tools handle them with dedicated models.
- 01Take 10 real photos with your own phone, in different light and settings.
- 02Collect 10 images from several AI generators, saved in their original form.
- 03Make copies of both sets that are screenshotted, cropped, resized or sent through a messaging app.
- 04Add a few AI-edited real photos, where only one area was changed.
- 05Run all files through both tools: the Sightengine dashboard or API, and the AnyFact web app.
- 06Record each verdict, whether it pointed to a reason, and every real photo marked as AI.
Our guide on how to tell if an image is AI-generated lists the visual checks to run alongside any tool. A result is an indication, not proof, especially on compressed or cropped images.
AI Video & Deepfake Detector · Free plan
Check a video clip or a public video link: frames, faces and soundtrack are scored, and suspicious moments are placed on a timeline.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good Sightengine alternative?
If you need another API for moderation or AI image detection, Hive, Copyleaks, TruthScan, Reality Defender and Resemble AI describe developer APIs on their sites. If a person needs to check individual files and get an explained verdict, AnyFact covers seven content types in a web app.
Does AnyFact have an AI image detection API?
Not yet. AnyFact has no public API, so it does not fit automated upload screening today. It is a web app where you upload a file or paste a link.
Can I use Sightengine without coding?
Sightengine’s site describes a drag-and-drop dashboard for checking media without code, alongside its API.
Why does AnyFact check metadata first?
Because a declared origin is the clearest evidence available. If a file’s C2PA content credentials or EXIF/XMP metadata name a known AI generator, AnyFact says so and gives that reason. If there is no such data, the classifier scores the image.
Does AnyFact moderate nudity or violence like Sightengine?
No. AnyFact answers a single question, whether content appears AI-generated, and does not classify nudity, violence or other moderation categories. Use a moderation service such as Sightengine for that.